Literasi Algoritmik dan Otoritas Keagamaan : Kompetensi Kritis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Agama Islam dalam Menavigasi Kecerdasan Buatan (AI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58561/jkpi.v5i2.325Keywords:
Literasi Algoritmik, Otorita Keagamaan, Pendidikan Islam, Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence/AI), Diskursus Keagamaan DigitalAbstract
Penelitian ini mengkaji secara mendalam persinggungan antara literasi algoritmik dan otoritas keagamaan dalam lanskap wacana Islam digital yang kian dipengaruhi oleh kecerdasan buatan. Tujuan utama penelitian ini adalah menganalisis bagaimana mahasiswa Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) membangun dan mempraktikkan kompetensi kritis dalam menavigasi, mengevaluasi, serta memverifikasi konten keagamaan yang dihasilkan maupun dikurasi oleh sistem berbasis AI. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif-analitis. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam dan observasi digital terhadap mahasiswa pada program studi Pendidikan Agama Islam di Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun mahasiswa memiliki tingkat literasi digital dan kecakapan teknis yang relatif baik, kemampuan mereka dalam melakukan pembacaan kritis terhadap otoritas keagamaan berbasis AI masih cenderung tidak konsisten dan dalam banyak kasus tetap bergantung pada mekanisme validasi tradisional, seperti rujukan kepada ulama, kitab klasik, dan otoritas institusional. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi tiga dimensi utama kompetensi yang diperlukan, yaitu: (1) kemampuan evaluatif terhadap akurasi dan kredibilitas konten keagamaan digital; (2) kesadaran epistemologis dalam memahami sumber, bias algoritma, dan konstruksi pengetahuan berbasis AI; serta (3) integrasi nilai-nilai keislaman dalam praktik literasi digital yang bertanggung jawab. Temuan ini menegaskan urgensi integrasi literasi algoritmik dalam kurikulum PAI sebagai upaya strategis untuk menjaga otentisitas dan integritas pengetahuan keagamaan di era kecerdasan buatan. Selain itu, penelitian ini berkontribusi dalam merumuskan kerangka konseptual literasi digital-keagamaan yang adaptif dan kontekstual bagi pendidikan tinggi Islam di era Society 5.0.
References
Anderson, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence and the future of religion. Journal of Futures Studies, 25(3), 45–60.
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian: suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Beer, D. (2017). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1–13.
Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning. Routledge.
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi.org
Bucher, T. (2018). If... Then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
Bunt, G. (2018). Hashtag Islam: How cyber-Islamic environments are transforming religious authority. UNC Press.
Bunt, G. R. (2018). Hashtag Islam: How cyber-Islamic environments are transforming religious authority. University of North Carolina Press.
Campbell, H. (2010). When religion meets new media. Routledge.
Campbell, H. (2021). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Routledge.
Campbell, H., & Evolvi, G. (2020). Contextualizing current digital religion research. New Media & Society, 22(5), 905–922.
Cheong, P. (2020). Authority. In The Oxford Handbook of Digital Religion. Oxford University Press.
Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dogruel, L., Masur, P. K., & Joeckel, S. (2022). Development and validation of an algorithm literacy scale for internet users. Communication Methods and Measures, 16(2), 115–133.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. doi.org
Evolvi, G. (2018). Blogging my religion: Secular, Muslim, and Catholic media spaces. Digital Journalism, 6(5), 640–656.
Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. Japan Spotlight, 27(5), 47–50.
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In Media technologies. MIT Press.
Hutchings, T. (2017). Creating church online. Routledge.
Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri in my hand. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25.
Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2007). Critical media literacy, democracy, and the reconstruction of education. In D. Macedo & S. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Media literacy: A reader (pp. 3–23). Peter Lang.
Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29.
Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate. International Journal of Communication, 11, 411–427.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Livingstone, S. (2018). Audiences in an age of datafication. Television & New Media, 19(6), 543–550.
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16.
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
Muthohirin, N. (2020). Digital Islam and youth. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 14(2), 255–276.
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078.
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2019). Personal data literacies: A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data. New Media & Society, 21(2), 419–437.
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble. Penguin.
Prensky, M. (2012). From digital natives to digital wisdom: Hopeful essays for 21st century learning. Corwin.
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. SAGE Publications.
Puzic, S. (2021). Epistemic vigilance in digital era. Media Studies Journal, 12(2), 88–102.
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and modernity: Transformation of an intellectual tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Sahin, A. (2018). Critical issues in contemporary Islamic Education: An introduction. Religions, 9(11), 339.
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology. Bloomsbury.
Shin, D. (2021). The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 146, 102551
Singler, B. (2020). Religion and AI. Zygon, 55(1), 247–261.
Striphas, T. (2015). Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4-5), 395–412.
Subiakto, H. (2020). Digital literacy in Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi, 12(2), 123–134.
Subiakto, H. (2020). Literasi digital dan disinformasi di era media baru. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 9(2), 105–112.
Sunstein, C. (2018). #Republic. Princeton University Press.
Techane, M. (2023). Digital religion challenges. Religions, 14(2), 210.
Techane, M. A. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the transformation of religious communication in the digital age. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 12(2), 155–170.
UNESCO. (2021). Media and information literacy: Policy and strategy guidelines. UNESCO Publishing.
Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2019). Lateral reading. Teachers College Record, 121(11), 1–40.
Woolf, B. P. (2021). AI in education. Routledge.
Zarman, W. (2022). Digital literacy in Islamic education. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 55–70.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Raden Muhamad Hilmi Maulana, Deni Lesmana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
